01
Why the law is on your side
A foreclosure sale pays off a debt. When the sale brings in more than the debt, the difference is called surplus, overage or excess proceeds, and the starting rule is old and simple: it goes back to the person who owned the property.

The Supreme Court traced that rule back more than 800 years. In Tyler v. Hennepin County, Chief Justice Roberts wrote that the principle "that a government may not take more from a taxpayer than she owes can trace its origins at least as far back as Runnymeade in 1215," and that from the founding the federal government could sell only as much land "as may be necessary to satisfy the taxes due thereon." (Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 (2023), slip op. Part II-B)
The Court also counted where the states stood in 2023: "Thirty-six States and the Federal Government require that the excess value be returned to the taxpayer." The remaining states were the minority, and Tyler is the case that told them their rule broke the Constitution.
For mortgage foreclosures, state statutes have long sent the surplus to the former owner once the lender and any other lienholders are paid. The catch is that almost nobody is told about it in plain language, deadlines apply, and the money sits with the state or the records office until someone with the right paperwork asks for it.
02
The Tyler decision
Geraldine Tyler owned a one-bedroom condominium in Minneapolis. After she moved to a senior community, the property taxes went unpaid and, with interest and penalties, the debt reached about $15,000.

Where the money goes: the numbers in Tyler
Minnesota law at the time let the county take title, sell the home and keep everything, including the $25,000 above the debt. Ms. Tyler sued. The trial court and the Eighth Circuit ruled against her. On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court reversed in a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts.
"The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, but no more."
What the Court decided
- Keeping the surplus was a taking under the Fifth Amendment. The county "could not use the toehold of the tax debt to confiscate more property than was due," which the Court called "a classic taking in which the government directly appropriates private property for its own use."
- A state cannot erase the owner's interest just by writing a statute that says there is none. Quoting earlier cases, the Court said a state may not "sidestep the Takings Clause by disavowing traditional property interests."
- Unpaid taxes are not abandonment. The Court rejected the county's argument that Ms. Tyler gave up her home by not paying, because Minnesota's law looked only at the unpaid taxes, not at whether she had abandoned the property.
What it did not decide
- The Eighth Amendment question. Ms. Tyler also argued the forfeiture was an excessive fine. Because the takings ruling fully remedied her harm, the Court said it "need not decide" that issue. Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Jackson, wrote separately to flag problems with the lower courts' reasoning on it.
- Exactly how states must run surplus claims. The Court distinguished Nelson v. City of New York (1956), where the law gave owners a set window to ask for the surplus and they did not use it. That leaves room for states to require a timely claim, which is why deadlines still matter after Tyler.
Since 2023, state legislatures and courts have been rewriting their tax foreclosure rules to follow Tyler. The next section lists the cases and laws we can point you to directly.
03
Precedent by state
Michigan got there first. In 2020 its Supreme Court ruled on a case where Oakland County foreclosed over an unpaid balance of $8.41, which grew to $285.81 with interest and fees, sold the property for $24,500 and kept the rest.

"We hold that defendants' retention of those surplus proceeds is an unconstitutional taking without just compensation under Article 10, § 2 of our 1963 Constitution."
| Case or law | Court or body | Year | What it decided | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 | U.S. Supreme Court | 2023 | A county that keeps the surplus from a tax foreclosure sale takes property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. | Opinion |
| Rafaeli, LLC v. Oakland County, 505 Mich. 429 | Michigan Supreme Court | 2020 | Keeping surplus proceeds after a tax foreclosure sale is a taking under the Michigan Constitution. | Opinion |
| MCL 211.78t (2020 PA 256) | Michigan Legislature | 2020 | Michigan's response to Rafaeli: a claims procedure for former owners to seek "remaining proceeds," with a notice deadline after foreclosure and a court process. | Statute |
| Hall v. Meisner, 51 F.4th 185 | U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit | 2022 | Oakland County took a home worth close to $300,000 over a $22,642 tax debt. The court held the owners plausibly alleged that taking their equitable title without paying for it violates the federal Takings Clause. | Opinion |
| Fair v. Continental Resources and Nieveen v. TAX 106 | U.S. Supreme Court (order list) | 2023 | Both Nebraska tax-deed cases were vacated and sent back to the Nebraska Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of Tyler." | Order list, June 5, 2023 |
| Continental Resources v. Fair, 317 Neb. 391 | Nebraska Supreme Court | 2024 | On remand, reversed judgment against the former owner on his takings claim and sent it back for further proceedings. The case is not finished. | Opinion |
| Nieveen v. TAX 106, 317 Neb. 425 | Nebraska Supreme Court | 2024 | On remand, held the former owner stated a plausible takings claim against the tax-deed holder and sent it back for further proceedings. | Opinion |
| Minn. Stat. § 282.005 (Laws 2024, ch. 127, art. 70) | Minnesota Legislature | 2024 | Minnesota's response to Tyler: tax-forfeited property must first be offered at public auction, and interested parties get notice of any surplus with a claim form. Applies to forfeitures after December 31, 2023. | Statute |
| Laws 2024, ch. 113 (Minnesota) | Minnesota Legislature | 2024 | For older forfeitures, counties could join a settlement run by a claims administrator, with set rules for selling forfeited properties and sharing the proceeds. | Session law |
| Acts 2024, ch. 140 (G.L. c. 60, § 64A) | Massachusetts Legislature | 2024 | Defines "excess equity" and says a former owner is entitled to it after a tax title foreclosure, on written request, under a new section 64A. | Session law |
| 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC v. Roberto, 477 N.J. Super. 339 | New Jersey Appellate Division | 2023 | Applied Tyler to New Jersey's Tax Sale Law and upheld vacating a foreclosure judgment that had wiped out the owner's equity. | Opinion |
| 257-261 20th Avenue Realty, LLC v. Roberto (A-29-23) | New Jersey Supreme Court | 2025 | Unanimous: the pre-2024 Tax Sale Law was unconstitutional to the extent it allowed forfeiture of surplus equity without just compensation. The opinion notes the Legislature amended the law in response to Tyler (L. 2024, c. 39). | Opinion |
Each link opens the official opinion, order or statute. Last checked October 6, 2026.
Where the decisions and statutes on this page come from
- Federal, 2023. Tyler v. Hennepin County, U.S. Supreme Court.
- Michigan, 2020. Rafaeli v. Oakland County and MCL 211.78t; Hall v. Meisner (6th Cir.) in 2022.
- Nebraska, 2024. Fair and Nieveen, sent back in light of Tyler in 2023 and decided on remand in 2024.
- Minnesota, 2024. Minn. Stat. § 282.005 and Laws 2024, ch. 113, the state's response to Tyler.
- Massachusetts, 2024. Acts 2024, ch. 140 (G.L. c. 60, § 64A).
- New Jersey, 2025. 20th Avenue Realty v. Roberto, Appellate Division in 2023 and Supreme Court in 2025.
- Florida. Fla. Stat. § 45.032, the mortgage foreclosure surplus statute.
"The Takings Clause would be a dead letter if a state could simply exclude from its definition of property any interest that the state wished to take."
Two things stand out in the Nebraska and New Jersey cases. In both states a private investor, not the county, ended up with the property, and the courts still treated keeping the owner's equity as a possible taking. Both Nebraska cases were sent back to the trial courts in 2024, so their final outcomes are still open, and we do not predict them here.
This list covers decisions and statutes we have read in full at their official sources. Other states have changed their rules since 2023 as well; we check the current law in your state when we review your case.
04
Tax sale surplus vs mortgage foreclosure surplus
Tyler is about tax foreclosures. Most homeowners we speak with lost their home to a mortgage foreclosure instead, and that money is governed by a different set of rules.
Tax sale surplus
The home is sold, or taken, over unpaid property taxes. Before Tyler, a minority of states let the government or a tax-deed buyer keep the equity. Tyler and the state cases above say the owner's equity is protected property. States now differ on how a former owner asks for it, and some changes apply only to sales after a certain date.
Mortgage foreclosure surplus
The lender forecloses and the home sells at auction. State foreclosure statutes have long required the surplus to go to the former owner after the lender and any junior liens are paid. The money is usually held by the court or the trustee, and later it can move to the state's unclaimed property fund.
Side by side: how each kind of surplus moves
Florida is a clear example of how the mortgage side works. Its statute creates "a rebuttable legal presumption that the owner of record on the date of the filing of a lis pendens is the person entitled to surplus funds after payment of subordinate lienholders who have timely filed a claim." It also says that one year after the sale, surplus still held by the clerk is presumed unclaimed and is sent on to the state's unclaimed property program, unless a court proceeding is pending. (Fla. Stat. § 45.032)
Every state sets its own claim windows, and they are not the same for tax sales and mortgage sales. Some are measured in months, some in years, and the clock usually starts at the sale. Because the deadline depends on the state, the type of sale and the date, we confirm it for your property during the free assessment rather than quote a single number here.
05
How the claim proceeds with us
Same four steps you see on our home page, with the verification and notary steps shown where they happen.
-
Assessment
You fill out a short assessment form with the address of the property that was foreclosed. We search public records and tell you what we find within 24 hours. There is no cost to check.
-
Recovery Process
If funds appear to be held in your name, you review and sign our agreement and can ask us anything first. We then verify the funds with the records office: that the surplus exists, what liens come ahead of it, and what the state requires from you to release it.
-
Claim Submission Form Notary step
Once the funds are verified, you sign the Claim Submission Form in front of a notary who confirms your identity. The notary can meet you at home, at a public place, or online. There is no cost to you for the notary.

-
Voluminous Filings
We prepare and file the claim documents and handle the back-and-forth with the agencies involved. Multiple rounds of filings often take place over time, and we keep you updated as each one moves.
-
Distribution
When the state releases the funds, we distribute your share into your bank account under the terms of your agreement.
06
Fees and timing

Our success-based fee is 30% of the amount recovered. Every cost of the claim comes out of our share: notary, court filing, attorney and any other fees. You never pay them. Example: a $50,000 recovery nets you $35,000. No upfront costs, and we are only paid when you are.
Checking your eligibility is free, and we respond within 24 hours. Our average recovery is $45K, though every case depends on the sale price, the liens paid ahead of you and the state's rules, so your amount may be higher or lower.
On timing, our estimated recovery period is typically 2-3 months, but it may vary according to state case complexity and third-party response times. Records offices set their own pace, and some states require a court hearing before money is released.
07
Frequently asked questions
Does the Tyler decision mean I am owed money?
Not automatically. Tyler says the government cannot keep the equity above a tax debt. Whether money is held for you depends on what your home sold for, what was owed, the liens on it, the date of the sale and your state's claim rules. That is what our free assessment checks.
My lender foreclosed, not the tax collector. Does any of this apply to me?
Yes, under different rules. Mortgage foreclosure surplus has long belonged to the former owner under state foreclosure statutes, after the lender and other lienholders are paid. Tyler mostly changed the law for tax foreclosures.
Is there a deadline to claim surplus funds?
Yes. Every state sets its own window, and it can differ for tax sales and mortgage sales. In some states unclaimed surplus moves to the state's unclaimed property fund after a set period. We confirm the deadline for your property when we review your case.
What does it cost?
Our success-based fee is 30% of the amount recovered. Every cost of the claim comes out of our share: notary, court filing, attorney and any other fees. You never pay them. Example: a $50,000 recovery nets you $35,000. No upfront costs, and we are only paid when you are.
Do I have to pay for the notary?
No. A notary verifies your identity when you sign the Claim Submission Form, at your home, a public place or online, and there is no cost to you for the notary.
Are you a law firm?
No. Foreclosure Recovery Inc. is an asset recovery administration service, not a law firm, and we do not give legal advice. We handle the research, paperwork and follow-up needed to recover surplus funds held in your name.
.png)
